![]() ![]() When that model goes on sale for $100, it's probably the best value in tablets. That said, the 8-core processor and GPU - the graphics processor - are faster in the 10-inch Fire HD 10, which also has a sharper 1080p display. It isn't as responsive as an entry-level iPad, which is often on sale for about $250, but it's overall pretty smooth and I didn't have any problem running games like Asphalt 9: Legends. At 355 grams, the new Fire HD 8 weighs a touch less than its 363g predecessor.Ī few years back, the HD 8 seemed sluggish, but its performance has steadily improved and now it's pretty zippy (Amazon says the new HD 8s are 30% faster than the 2018 HD 8 thanks to the new processor and software optimization). It's fine for watching videos but it's not nearly as sharp as the screen you get with, say, an iPad, which is why you're paying a lot less for this. The screen is technically HD but it's basically 720p and not 1080p. ![]() David Carnoy/CNETīoth new Fire HD 8 models have the same 1,280x800-pixel resolution display as the previous HD 8. The Fire HD 8 now features USB-C charging. The USB-C charging does help reduce charging times by about an hour from the previous HD 8, with the HD 8 Plus charging even faster. The standard HD 8 has 2GB of RAM - that's up from 1.5 - and the HD 8 Plus has 3GB of RAM, which is where you get the performance boost. Both models improve over the previous 2018 Fire HD 8 version with a faster processor, USB-C charging, improved Wi-Fi performance and a bump from 16GB to 32GB of storage in the base model. But apart from the white version, they all have a black bezel around the display. The HD 8 Plus is only available in a slate color while the standard HD 8 is available in black, white, plum, twilight blue and slate. The two models look identical on the outside. ![]() Currently, it's the unrivaled king in terms of price-to-performance ratio.Optional wireless charging dock turns the HD 8 Plus into an Echo Showĭisplay is HD but not 1080p (could be sharper)Īmazon app store is limited compared to Google Play and Apple app store But the truth is, not everyone has deep pockets to spare, so for most people, the Adreno 725 is more than sufficient for their needs. So, by spending significantly more money, you're essentially only getting upgraded GPUs: Adreno 725 vs. In fact, it's even comparable to the 8 Gen 2 in CPU performance. The 7+ Gen 2 is also comparable to the 8+ Gen 1 in terms of architecture and CPU performance. Therefore, the 7+ Gen 2 will always outperform it in both the price-to-performance ratio and, crucially, in efficiency and throttling, thanks to TSMC manufacturing. Secondly, the chip you compared - the 8 Gen 1 - falls short in terms of optimization and throttling because it's manufactured by Samsung. And honestly, we don't need anything more than that - anything beyond would be essentially superfluous, and we don't have extra money to burn. As PUBG is an Unreal Engine game, this performance really demonstrates the capabilities of the Adreno 725. PUBG Mobile has 90 FPS already unlocked in the smooth graphics settings on this device, and it consistently delivers 60 FPS in Ultra HD Graphics. When it comes to actual gameplay, who really plays games at maximum graphics quality? What truly matters is the Frames Per Second (FPS). For budget-conscious gamers, particularly in India, there's no processor that can rival the price-to-performance ratio of the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |